<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Bloqhead.com | The Portfolio of Daryn A. St. Pierre</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bloqhead.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bloqhead.com</link>
	<description>We are the pioneers and the web is our ocean.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:48:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Reviewing The Kramer Mod &#8211; Improve Those Cheap Headphones by Decent earbuds for cheap? - Overclock.net - Overclocking.net</title>
		<link>http://bloqhead.com/2009/07/06/reviewing-the-kramer-mod-improve-those-cheap-headphones/comment-page-1/#comment-570</link>
		<dc:creator>Decent earbuds for cheap? - Overclock.net - Overclocking.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloqhead.com/?p=403#comment-570</guid>
		<description>[...] really cheap earbuds, IMHO, are JVC Marshmallows. They&#039;re about $20. Then you can always do the Kramer Mod on them.     __________________  World Cup Predictions!  ESI Juli@ -&gt; Soloz Audio Reference RCA [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] really cheap earbuds, IMHO, are JVC Marshmallows. They&#39;re about $20. Then you can always do the Kramer Mod on them.     __________________  World Cup Predictions!  ESI Juli@ -&gt; Soloz Audio Reference RCA [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The NewReview In Town by Kansas City Bands</title>
		<link>http://bloqhead.com/2009/10/06/the-newreview-in-town/comment-page-1/#comment-558</link>
		<dc:creator>Kansas City Bands</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 02:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloqhead.com/?p=497#comment-558</guid>
		<description>I love what you guys are always up too. Such clever work and reporting! Keep up the great works guys I&#039;ve added you guys to my blogroll. This is a great article thanks for sharing this informative information.. I will visit your blog regularly for some latest post.:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love what you guys are always up too. Such clever work and reporting! Keep up the great works guys I&#8217;ve added you guys to my blogroll. This is a great article thanks for sharing this informative information.. I will visit your blog regularly for some latest post.:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Carol Zara Featured on G4TV&#8217;s Women of The Web by Adam</title>
		<link>http://bloqhead.com/2009/12/30/carol-zara-featured-on-g4tvs-women-of-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-529</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 02:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloqhead.com/?p=535#comment-529</guid>
		<description>Daryn is keeping his pimp-hand strong on the World Wide Web ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daryn is keeping his pimp-hand strong on the World Wide Web <img src='http://bloqhead.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tables vs. CSS? This debate still exists?! by diseño web</title>
		<link>http://bloqhead.com/2009/02/14/tables-vs-css-this-debate-still-exists/comment-page-1/#comment-511</link>
		<dc:creator>diseño web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/wordpress/?p=33#comment-511</guid>
		<description>The one that continues using tables is because it does not dominate or does not know CSS. To design in CSS is far better, by the subject of order, maintenance, accessibility, navigability and thousand reasons more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one that continues using tables is because it does not dominate or does not know CSS. To design in CSS is far better, by the subject of order, maintenance, accessibility, navigability and thousand reasons more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reviewing The Kramer Mod &#8211; Improve Those Cheap Headphones by Chris</title>
		<link>http://bloqhead.com/2009/07/06/reviewing-the-kramer-mod-improve-those-cheap-headphones/comment-page-1/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 01:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloqhead.com/?p=403#comment-359</guid>
		<description>hey nice site man, i ripped out the paper thing in my left marshmallow earbud as soon as i got it anyway to make it louder because i cant hear too well out of that ear. but i followed your instructions with the foam thing and it increased the lower frequencies extremely well without eliminating the highs. also if u want deeper bass take a pack of the spare sony silicone earplugs and replace the foam ear tips.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey nice site man, i ripped out the paper thing in my left marshmallow earbud as soon as i got it anyway to make it louder because i cant hear too well out of that ear. but i followed your instructions with the foam thing and it increased the lower frequencies extremely well without eliminating the highs. also if u want deeper bass take a pack of the spare sony silicone earplugs and replace the foam ear tips.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reviewing The Kramer Mod &#8211; Improve Those Cheap Headphones by Daryn</title>
		<link>http://bloqhead.com/2009/07/06/reviewing-the-kramer-mod-improve-those-cheap-headphones/comment-page-1/#comment-344</link>
		<dc:creator>Daryn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 02:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloqhead.com/?p=403#comment-344</guid>
		<description>Hey, Jaz. Thanks for the kind words about my site. I&#039;ve been updating bits and pieces of it over time. That&#039;s cool that you found this via Google. I did a Google search for &quot;Kramer Mod&quot; myself and it came up second! I&#039;m happy about that. Like I said in the blog post, I had a hard time finding one definitive tutorial on how to do this. I had to wing it a little bit but it wasn&#039;t that hard to begin with. Anyone should be able to do this same modification to a set of headphones with a similar assembly.

I&#039;m glad you and your friend found this helpful. Please pass it along if anyone else is interested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Jaz. Thanks for the kind words about my site. I&#8217;ve been updating bits and pieces of it over time. That&#8217;s cool that you found this via Google. I did a Google search for &#8220;Kramer Mod&#8221; myself and it came up second! I&#8217;m happy about that. Like I said in the blog post, I had a hard time finding one definitive tutorial on how to do this. I had to wing it a little bit but it wasn&#8217;t that hard to begin with. Anyone should be able to do this same modification to a set of headphones with a similar assembly.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad you and your friend found this helpful. Please pass it along if anyone else is interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reviewing The Kramer Mod &#8211; Improve Those Cheap Headphones by Jaz</title>
		<link>http://bloqhead.com/2009/07/06/reviewing-the-kramer-mod-improve-those-cheap-headphones/comment-page-1/#comment-343</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloqhead.com/?p=403#comment-343</guid>
		<description>Woah, was looking for this mod for my friend (I&#039;d done it myself a few months ago) and saw this link on Google talking about it! Awesome :) the site&#039;s looking great Daryn. btw, the mod really is great &amp; worth doing, made my marshmallows sound a lot more fuller than they did before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woah, was looking for this mod for my friend (I&#8217;d done it myself a few months ago) and saw this link on Google talking about it! Awesome <img src='http://bloqhead.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  the site&#8217;s looking great Daryn. btw, the mod really is great &amp; worth doing, made my marshmallows sound a lot more fuller than they did before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quality vs. Quantity &#8211; You Are Not A Guru by Snag Everyone Online</title>
		<link>http://bloqhead.com/2009/05/24/quality-vs-quantity-you-are-not-a-guru/comment-page-1/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>Snag Everyone Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloqhead.com/?p=302#comment-338</guid>
		<description>Ugh, I so agree. I&#039;m doing a project right nwo for my SEO company on building Twitter followers. I&#039;m trying all the methods and let me tell you from experience, those quick-build techniques are awful! You get thousands of followers but the quality sucks. I remember being at a Social Media conference and hearing one of the speakers say &quot;yea, you get 3 million followers and then one day you realize 90 percent of them are porn bots. Porn bots don&#039;t usually buy website services&quot;. 

Ah, the truth comes out. I think the best way to judge Twitter followers is to see the follower/follow-ee ration. If you&#039;re only following 10 people but have 10,000 followers you clearly have a group of people who are supporting you and NOT just looking for follow backs. 

That&#039;s just my opinion though. 

The same concept goes for incoming links (quality vs. quantity) just did a blog on it Great points. From an SEO perspective, link-building is such a great way to increase traffic. Not only does it increase traffic by referring visitors but it also makes you show up higher on Google listings. I just wrote a blog about it that emphasizes a lot of the points you just made, thought it might tickle your fancy (http://www.snageveryone.com/apps/blog/show/2348039-the-truth-behind-linking). 

And no, that&#039;s not a link for spam purposes, thought you might actually enjoy the blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh, I so agree. I&#8217;m doing a project right nwo for my SEO company on building Twitter followers. I&#8217;m trying all the methods and let me tell you from experience, those quick-build techniques are awful! You get thousands of followers but the quality sucks. I remember being at a Social Media conference and hearing one of the speakers say &#8220;yea, you get 3 million followers and then one day you realize 90 percent of them are porn bots. Porn bots don&#8217;t usually buy website services&#8221;. </p>
<p>Ah, the truth comes out. I think the best way to judge Twitter followers is to see the follower/follow-ee ration. If you&#8217;re only following 10 people but have 10,000 followers you clearly have a group of people who are supporting you and NOT just looking for follow backs. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s just my opinion though. </p>
<p>The same concept goes for incoming links (quality vs. quantity) just did a blog on it Great points. From an SEO perspective, link-building is such a great way to increase traffic. Not only does it increase traffic by referring visitors but it also makes you show up higher on Google listings. I just wrote a blog about it that emphasizes a lot of the points you just made, thought it might tickle your fancy (<a href="http://www.snageveryone.com/apps/blog/show/2348039-the-truth-behind-linking" rel="nofollow">http://www.snageveryone.com/apps/blog/show/2348039-the-truth-behind-linking</a>). </p>
<p>And no, that&#8217;s not a link for spam purposes, thought you might actually enjoy the blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Annoying Twitter Practices by D. Daniel Schave</title>
		<link>http://bloqhead.com/2009/10/15/annoying-twitter-practices/comment-page-1/#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Daniel Schave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 05:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloqhead.com/?p=510#comment-336</guid>
		<description>I love number one. Though I am not a huge Twitter fan (I&#039;m an FB whore), I understand where you&#039;re coming from. Inglorious bastadz!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love number one. Though I am not a huge Twitter fan (I&#8217;m an FB whore), I understand where you&#8217;re coming from. Inglorious bastadz!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on People Who Annoy Me At The Gym by Jack Moring</title>
		<link>http://bloqhead.com/2009/07/12/people-who-annoy-me-at-the-gym/comment-page-1/#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Moring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloqhead.com/?p=430#comment-331</guid>
		<description>I almost forgot why I quit working out at a gym.  Thanks for the reminder!  Very funny read, Daryn!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I almost forgot why I quit working out at a gym.  Thanks for the reminder!  Very funny read, Daryn!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
