<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Bloqhead.com | The Web Design Portfolio of Daryn St. Pierre</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bloqhead.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bloqhead.com</link>
	<description>We are the pioneers and the web is our ocean.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:38:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Upgraded to WordPress 3.0 &#8220;Thelonious&#8221; by Daryn</title>
		<link>http://bloqhead.com/2010/06/17/upgraded-to-wordpress-3-0-thelonious/comment-page-1/#comment-611</link>
		<dc:creator>Daryn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloqhead.com/?p=574#comment-611</guid>
		<description>Hey, Jack. Good to hear from you! I think my WSOD issue was a weird fluke that most likely involved 1 or more of the plugins I use. I&#039;ve been using the WordPress auto-updater since day 1 and it&#039;s always worked wonders for me. It was really weird. Installing manually wasn&#039;t so bad though. All I did was backup my themes, uploads and plugins and I was set. Clean, fresh 3.0 upgrade the slow way. Now I&#039;m on the admin panel and I see that there&#039;s a 3.0.1 update. Hopefully the auto-updater doesn&#039;t bork me again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Jack. Good to hear from you! I think my WSOD issue was a weird fluke that most likely involved 1 or more of the plugins I use. I&#8217;ve been using the WordPress auto-updater since day 1 and it&#8217;s always worked wonders for me. It was really weird. Installing manually wasn&#8217;t so bad though. All I did was backup my themes, uploads and plugins and I was set. Clean, fresh 3.0 upgrade the slow way. Now I&#8217;m on the admin panel and I see that there&#8217;s a 3.0.1 update. Hopefully the auto-updater doesn&#8217;t bork me again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Upgraded to WordPress 3.0 &#8220;Thelonious&#8221; by Jack Moring</title>
		<link>http://bloqhead.com/2010/06/17/upgraded-to-wordpress-3-0-thelonious/comment-page-1/#comment-610</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Moring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloqhead.com/?p=574#comment-610</guid>
		<description>Whoa, sorry to hear that.  Glad you got it back to normal.  I upgraded to WP 3.0 recently, but I luckily didn&#039;t have any trouble.

Have you tried the &lt;a href=&quot;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wordpress-automatic-upgrade/&quot; title=&quot;Wordpress Automatic Upgrade Plug-in&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wordpress Automatic Upgrade Plug-in&lt;/a&gt;?  I&#039;ve been using it since I can remember and it makes the upgrade process extremely painless (for me anyway).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa, sorry to hear that.  Glad you got it back to normal.  I upgraded to WP 3.0 recently, but I luckily didn&#8217;t have any trouble.</p>
<p>Have you tried the <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wordpress-automatic-upgrade/" title="Wordpress Automatic Upgrade Plug-in" rel="nofollow">WordPress Automatic Upgrade Plug-in</a>?  I&#8217;ve been using it since I can remember and it makes the upgrade process extremely painless (for me anyway).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IE8 Set to Screw Web Developers Once Again by R. Scott Smith</title>
		<link>http://bloqhead.com/2009/02/13/ie8-set-to-screw-web-developers-once-again/comment-page-1/#comment-609</link>
		<dc:creator>R. Scott Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/wordpress/?p=35#comment-609</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t tried that compatibility tag.  I will mention it to the others in our meeting today.  It&#039;s worth a shot.

My plan of attack is to rework queries to the server so less objects are on page at one time.  I have about 350 objects, give or take a few and Internet Exploder can&#039;t handle that many.  I have pagination set up to only display about 30 to 40 at a time.  But they are all there, just not visible.  My thinking in this design was that user interaction would minimize server queries and thus reduce response time.  Then, in each subset, the user could persist changes if they wanted to.

It actually works really well... in everything but IE.  So now I&#039;m going to look at redesigning the page to re-fetch objects as the user paginates through.  This will reduce the number of objects, but increase the user response time and make the user experience slower, possibly much slower with much bigger load to our servers.  I will make Restful, JSON queries to get the data to make it as fast as possible, but I still have to rework the object construction on the page, not to mention the Rest queries.

I don&#039;t even care if IE ends up being doggy about it.  It just has to work.  I have no concerns about the other browsers and their associated user experience because I&#039;ve seen that already and it was quite good.

I have to admit... it is extremely discouraging to not be working on cool, new stuff and customer requirements because I get to spin on Internet Exploder cruft for a few days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t tried that compatibility tag.  I will mention it to the others in our meeting today.  It&#8217;s worth a shot.</p>
<p>My plan of attack is to rework queries to the server so less objects are on page at one time.  I have about 350 objects, give or take a few and Internet Exploder can&#8217;t handle that many.  I have pagination set up to only display about 30 to 40 at a time.  But they are all there, just not visible.  My thinking in this design was that user interaction would minimize server queries and thus reduce response time.  Then, in each subset, the user could persist changes if they wanted to.</p>
<p>It actually works really well&#8230; in everything but IE.  So now I&#8217;m going to look at redesigning the page to re-fetch objects as the user paginates through.  This will reduce the number of objects, but increase the user response time and make the user experience slower, possibly much slower with much bigger load to our servers.  I will make Restful, JSON queries to get the data to make it as fast as possible, but I still have to rework the object construction on the page, not to mention the Rest queries.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t even care if IE ends up being doggy about it.  It just has to work.  I have no concerns about the other browsers and their associated user experience because I&#8217;ve seen that already and it was quite good.</p>
<p>I have to admit&#8230; it is extremely discouraging to not be working on cool, new stuff and customer requirements because I get to spin on Internet Exploder cruft for a few days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IE8 Set to Screw Web Developers Once Again by Daryn</title>
		<link>http://bloqhead.com/2009/02/13/ie8-set-to-screw-web-developers-once-again/comment-page-1/#comment-608</link>
		<dc:creator>Daryn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 04:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/wordpress/?p=35#comment-608</guid>
		<description>I feel your pain. I primarily write CSS, (X)HTML, javascript/jQuery and I run into stuff like this all the time. It&#039;s a neverending cycle and now it&#039;s all about IE9. The problem is that there&#039;s still a huge chunk of IE6 users somehow. Hell, I think there&#039;s even a really small userbase still present for IE5! It&#039;s ridiculous. When it comes to developing for IE6 and under, we&#039;ve ditched it altogether. If a client specifically wants IE6 support, we charge extra for it. The amount of times in the past where we&#039;ve had to put out extra man hours to workaround IE issues has been a pain.

Sidenote: Have you tried using the IE7 compatibility tag? It&#039;s a stretch but perhaps telling the browser to render in IE7 compatibility mode might lessen the amount of issues you&#039;re having with your web app. I hate the tag because it&#039;s not standards compliant and I&#039;m anal about my code, but it might be worth a try. Other than that I guess I would say try to float as little as possible. It seems like when you have a lot of floated elements involved, something is bound to go haywire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel your pain. I primarily write CSS, (X)HTML, javascript/jQuery and I run into stuff like this all the time. It&#8217;s a neverending cycle and now it&#8217;s all about IE9. The problem is that there&#8217;s still a huge chunk of IE6 users somehow. Hell, I think there&#8217;s even a really small userbase still present for IE5! It&#8217;s ridiculous. When it comes to developing for IE6 and under, we&#8217;ve ditched it altogether. If a client specifically wants IE6 support, we charge extra for it. The amount of times in the past where we&#8217;ve had to put out extra man hours to workaround IE issues has been a pain.</p>
<p>Sidenote: Have you tried using the IE7 compatibility tag? It&#8217;s a stretch but perhaps telling the browser to render in IE7 compatibility mode might lessen the amount of issues you&#8217;re having with your web app. I hate the tag because it&#8217;s not standards compliant and I&#8217;m anal about my code, but it might be worth a try. Other than that I guess I would say try to float as little as possible. It seems like when you have a lot of floated elements involved, something is bound to go haywire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IE8 Set to Screw Web Developers Once Again by R. Scott Smith</title>
		<link>http://bloqhead.com/2009/02/13/ie8-set-to-screw-web-developers-once-again/comment-page-1/#comment-607</link>
		<dc:creator>R. Scott Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 04:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/wordpress/?p=35#comment-607</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m so hopping mad at Microshaft right now, I&#039;m just spitting fire and brimstone.  I just got a module working with Dojo that has a lot of floating objects and lots of behavior built into them.  It&#039;s a Java Enterprise web application.  Things were swell in all browsers.  I develop on Slackware Linux so I tried Firefox, Chrome, and Opera.  Everything looks great, acts great, I couldn&#039;t be more pleased.

Then I had someone pull it up with a Windows XP machine with Internet Exploder 8.  Just crap!  Nothing works and it looks like hell.  Guess what?  I get to redesign all of it.  Why?  Because Microshaft pushes rubbish to the masses and now we&#039;re strung up with having to develop to its limitations.  I wish I could send a bill to those quacks for costing my employer a ton of money and for what?  NOTHING!  Everyone suffers.  The software will be less capable, the customer doesn&#039;t get the best experience, my employer loses money, and the product costs more for less quality.

Everyone loses with Internet Exploder and it has always been that way throughout its life cycle.  For what it&#039;s worth, I appreciate this article.  I needed to vent.  I need to know there are other people out there who are as disgusted and hateful as I am to the losers over at Microshaft.  If Microshaft would just go away *everyone*, users and developers alike, would be a whole lot better off.  We could get on with making lives better, solving customer problems, making share holders some money, and giving less headaches to developers.  We have enough to do without this  utter nonsense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so hopping mad at Microshaft right now, I&#8217;m just spitting fire and brimstone.  I just got a module working with Dojo that has a lot of floating objects and lots of behavior built into them.  It&#8217;s a Java Enterprise web application.  Things were swell in all browsers.  I develop on Slackware Linux so I tried Firefox, Chrome, and Opera.  Everything looks great, acts great, I couldn&#8217;t be more pleased.</p>
<p>Then I had someone pull it up with a Windows XP machine with Internet Exploder 8.  Just crap!  Nothing works and it looks like hell.  Guess what?  I get to redesign all of it.  Why?  Because Microshaft pushes rubbish to the masses and now we&#8217;re strung up with having to develop to its limitations.  I wish I could send a bill to those quacks for costing my employer a ton of money and for what?  NOTHING!  Everyone suffers.  The software will be less capable, the customer doesn&#8217;t get the best experience, my employer loses money, and the product costs more for less quality.</p>
<p>Everyone loses with Internet Exploder and it has always been that way throughout its life cycle.  For what it&#8217;s worth, I appreciate this article.  I needed to vent.  I need to know there are other people out there who are as disgusted and hateful as I am to the losers over at Microshaft.  If Microshaft would just go away *everyone*, users and developers alike, would be a whole lot better off.  We could get on with making lives better, solving customer problems, making share holders some money, and giving less headaches to developers.  We have enough to do without this  utter nonsense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Annoying Twitter Practices by Daryn</title>
		<link>http://bloqhead.com/2009/10/15/annoying-twitter-practices/comment-page-1/#comment-606</link>
		<dc:creator>Daryn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 02:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloqhead.com/?p=510#comment-606</guid>
		<description>SWEET. Now I can walk around with a hard-on, while looking at boobs and wearing my new &quot;Rolex&quot;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SWEET. Now I can walk around with a hard-on, while looking at boobs and wearing my new &#8220;Rolex&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Upgraded to WordPress 3.0 &#8220;Thelonious&#8221; by Alison Foxall</title>
		<link>http://bloqhead.com/2010/06/17/upgraded-to-wordpress-3-0-thelonious/comment-page-1/#comment-605</link>
		<dc:creator>Alison Foxall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 01:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloqhead.com/?p=574#comment-605</guid>
		<description>Glad to see you got everything squared away. I was worried that 3.0 blew up not only your site, but your computer and phone too. Tsk Tsk. I had no problem upgrading from RC on dev- but I&#039;m hesitant to do it on my portfolio. I&#039;ll start with my personal blog/journal, since no one reads it but me. ^_^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see you got everything squared away. I was worried that 3.0 blew up not only your site, but your computer and phone too. Tsk Tsk. I had no problem upgrading from RC on dev- but I&#8217;m hesitant to do it on my portfolio. I&#8217;ll start with my personal blog/journal, since no one reads it but me. ^_^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Annoying Twitter Practices by B</title>
		<link>http://bloqhead.com/2009/10/15/annoying-twitter-practices/comment-page-1/#comment-604</link>
		<dc:creator>B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 01:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloqhead.com/?p=510#comment-604</guid>
		<description>Sorry you&#039;re having so much trouble with Twitter. If you follow me I can show you how to get 500,000 followers in less than 10 minutes!  #Viagra, #boobs, #Rolex</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry you&#8217;re having so much trouble with Twitter. If you follow me I can show you how to get 500,000 followers in less than 10 minutes!  #Viagra, #boobs, #Rolex</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reviewing The Kramer Mod &#8211; Improve Those Cheap Headphones by Rich</title>
		<link>http://bloqhead.com/2009/07/06/reviewing-the-kramer-mod-improve-those-cheap-headphones/comment-page-1/#comment-601</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 23:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloqhead.com/?p=403#comment-601</guid>
		<description>Finally did this mod to my Skullcandies, and the quality really is a bit richer now. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally did this mod to my Skullcandies, and the quality really is a bit richer now. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Own Google Imageless Button by Ervin Ter</title>
		<link>http://bloqhead.com/2009/02/14/my-own-google-imageless-button/comment-page-1/#comment-589</link>
		<dc:creator>Ervin Ter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 01:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/wordpress/?p=69#comment-589</guid>
		<description>I run perfect under firefox, but running out of alignment in IE6.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I run perfect under firefox, but running out of alignment in IE6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
